The problem Shodh 1.0 solves

Shodh 1.0 promotes the concept of DeSci ( Decentralized Finance ), it is a DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) based on DeSci (Decentralized Science) that can provide a transparent and decentralized platform for researchers to share their work.

The decentralized nature of the platform allows anyone to access the research papers without restrictions, ensuring open access to knowledge. Anyone can carry forward their research and every state will be maintained securely onchain

The use of blockchain technology can ensure the authenticity and immutability of research papers, reducing the risk of plagiarism and fraud.
A DAO based on DeSci has the potential to revolutionize the way research is conducted and shared, providing a more open, transparent, and decentralized alternative to traditional scientific publishing.

Why choose us?
Zero Cost: We will be awarding tokens to researchers based on the number of verifications their research paper receives.

These tokens can be used by researchers to fund their next research project, promoting continued innovation and progress in their respective fields. Furthermore, this incentivization process encourages a culture of collaboration and peer review, which benefits the research community as a whole.

Open access: Our platform is committed to open access to knowledge, making research papers accessible to anyone with an internet connection, regardless of their location, financial status, or affiliation.

Decentralization: Our platform is built on DeSci, a decentralized technology that ensures that research papers are available to all without the need for intermediaries or centralized control.

Collaboration and networking: Our platform provides a space for researchers to connect, collaborate, and exchange ideas, fostering interdisciplinary and cross-cultural research partnerships.

Challenges we ran into

Challenges we are dealing with :

Ensuring the quality of reviewers: As the platform relies on a community of verified researchers to verify the quality and accuracy of research papers, there is a risk of fake reviewers or reviewers who are not qualified to provide expert feedback.
Managing disputes: There may be disagreements between researchers about the validity of research papers or the quality of reviews, which may require a dispute resolution process.

Scaling the platform: As the platform grows in popularity, it may become difficult to manage the increasing number of research papers and reviewers, requiring efficient and scalable solutions.

Building a sustainable business model: The platform will need to find a way to generate revenue to sustain the platform and incentivize reviewers and contributors, while still maintaining open access to knowledge.