Fragmented resource distribution: It bridges the gap between collective entities (like organizations, DAOs, and communities) and end-point collectors (such as merchants, schools, and food banks).
Lack of controlled resource access: It ensures a steady, regulated flow of funds to Recipients for approved Collector spending.
Inefficient fund management for groups: It provides a structured way for collectives to allocate resources to their members or beneficiaries.
Disconnected ecosystems: The system creates a seamless link between resource providers, individual recipients, and service providers/beneficiaries.
Complexity in decentralized operations: For DAOs and other decentralized communities, it offers a clear mechanism for resource flow and utilization.
Limited transparency: The centralized recipient model allows for better tracking and visibility of how resources move from collectives to end-point collectors.
Inflexibility in resource allocation: It allows for more dynamic and personalized distribution of resources based on individual recipient needs or choices.
In essence, this system solves the problem of efficiently and transparently managing and distributing shared resources in a way that empowers individual recipients while maintaining a connection between resource providers (collectives) and end-point beneficiaries or services (collectors).
We faced an issue with routing funds from the SNDR Allocation Strategy to the user. The challenge was deciding whether to use the drips contract directly or use the SNDR Core contract directly.
Tracks Applied (1)
PAYMENTS with Stripe
Cheering for a project means supporting a project you like with as little as 0.0025 ETH. Right now, you can Cheer using ETH on Arbitrum, Optimism and Base.
Discussion