Created on 6th October 2024
•
Third-party platforms nowadays selling cracked or pirated games has led to significant problems for both game publishers and consumers. These unauthorized copies not only deny publishers their rightful earnings but also expose users to potential security risks and unreliable game experiences. Currently, users who buy from such platforms lack a reliable way to verify the authenticity of their purchases, which diminishes trust in digital game purchases. The gaming industry struggles with these challenges, as pirated copies can easily bypass traditional verification mechanisms and then leaving both users and developers vulnerable.
EtherPlay addresses these issues by leveraging blockchain technology to create a decentralized game distribution platform. For every legitimate game purchase, EtherPlay issues a non-fungible token (NFT) that serves as proof of ownership. These NFTs act as a digital certificate, verifying the authenticity of each game in a user’s library. Through the use of blockchain, EtherPlay ensures that only users with valid NFTs can access the game, effectively preventing cracked or pirated copies from being used. This transparent and immutable method of verification guarantees that game publishers and developers are protected from revenue loss due to piracy.
EtherPlay supports the gaming ecosystem by ensuring fair compensation for publishers. Each game sold through the platform generates revenue directly for developers, as the purchase is tied to a unique NFT that cannot be duplicated or tampered with. This way EtherPlay not only combats piracy but also fosters a sustainable model where both users and publishers benefit from a secure, decentralized environment for purchasing and playing games. Through the power of blockchain, EtherPlay creates a trust-based digital game marketplace, thus solving the long-standing issues of piracy and verification in the gaming industry.
We encountered several challenges during our development process, particularly with Solidity. Many of the resources we found, especially OpenZeppelin tutorials, were outdated and focused on versions below 4.x, while the current version is 5.x. This led to compatibility issues and forced us to rethink our approach as we adapted to the newer framework. Additionally, Scaffold-ETH, though powerful, was complex, and our limited experience with it slowed down progress. Our team struggled to fully grasp its functionality, which led to difficulties in integrating the smart contract into the frontend seamlessly.
Another problem was Foundry, which we attempted to use for local development. However, being first-time users of this tool, we couldn’t implement it effectively, which made us pivot back to a more familiar environment. We decided to revert to a stack we were comfortable with since time is short: using Next.js with Tailwind for the frontend, and deploying smart contracts through Remix IDE. We then used the contract’s ABI to connect it to our frontend via ethers.js. This transition allowed us to move forward with greater confidence, even though we couldn’t leverage all the decentralized tools we initially planned to use.
Our idea generation phase was also challenging. Our first ideas weren’t well-defined, but thanks to guidance from Nic, our mentor, we were able to brainstorm effectively and come up with a solid concept. Nic’s mentorship played a key role in refining our approach, helping us transform our initial ideas into a more viable and impactful solution. Despite these challenges, the experience was invaluable, teaching us to adapt and refine our process while still achieving a strong, practical outcome.
Technologies used